Rankform
Blog/Leave and balances
People & HR8 min read

Next year’s leave schedule: how to plan it without an empty August

In October a leave schedule feels like paperwork. In July it is the only thing standing between your team and three weeks with half the desks empty. A good schedule does not take away anyone’s freedom to choose - it simply finds the clashes while they are still easy to untangle.

Why plan if people can just agree?

In a small team leave runs on verbal agreements for a long time: “I’ll take August, you take September.” That works while there are five of you sitting in one room. After that the agreements start to crack in predictable places:

  • First to ask, first to go. The best weeks go to whoever is quickest, not to whoever needs them most - and it is the same people every year;
  • Clashes surface too late. That three of the four people in support are off at the same time comes out after the tickets are bought;
  • Days pile up. People who do not plan their rest do not take it, and by December there are balances to carry over, let expire or pay out - the trade-offs we covered in the carry-over article;
  • Nobody outside the team knows who to count on. Clients, projects and neighbouring teams find out about absences on the day they start.

A schedule for the year does not cancel flexibility. It gives you a starting point - and agreeing a change to a plan is much easier than negotiating from a blank page every time.

The preparation calendar

The most common mistake is starting in December, when half the team is already thinking about the holidays. The work splits into five steps, and the first one comes two months before the new year:

Five steps to an approved schedule. The last one never ends: the schedule is reviewed every quarter.

The dates are only a guide; the order is what matters. Rules come before wishes, wishes come before the draft, and the draft is shown to people before it is approved. Two or three days for objections defuse most of the resentment before anything is published.

Rules come before wishes, not after

If the rules appear after people have sent in their wishes, every “no” feels personal. If they come first, they are simply the frame everyone plans inside. Four rules cover almost everything:

  • Minimum coverage. How many people must stay - for the whole team or for each role. For example, “at least 70% of the department” or “at least two of the five in support”;
  • Blackout weeks. Weeks when leave is not approved: the year-end close, the seasonal peak, a big launch. Keep them few, and give each one a reason;
  • At least one long break. A week here, two days there - and the person never actually rests. Many companies ask that at least one part of the leave is two weeks or longer;
  • How many at once. A plain cap - “no more than two from one team” - is often clearer than a percentage.
Week-by-week presence for a team of ten. In the first draft three August weeks drop below the minimum; after the draft is agreed, two people move part of their leave to June and September - and no week falls through.

How to collect wishes

One date from each person is the worst format: wherever dates clash, you can only refuse, with no alternative to offer. This works better:

  • Two or three options, ranked. “First choice 4-15 August, second choice 1-12 September.” Building the draft then becomes matching, not refusing;
  • Windows instead of exact dates. “Two weeks in the second half of July” leaves room to manoeuvre; “14-27 July” does not;
  • A clear deadline. 15 December, for instance. Anyone who has not answered by then gets suggested dates, which they can change within a week;
  • Do not forget the quiet ones. The person who will “decide later” most often ends the year with the biggest balance and the most fatigue.

When everyone wants August

Summer, school holidays and the week between Christmas and New Year always have more takers than places. Write down how those weeks are shared before anyone asks - and make the rule simple enough that anyone can check it themselves.

Rotation is the fairest approach: split the team into a few groups and let the groups choose the busy weeks in turn. Next year the order shifts - whoever chose last now chooses first.

The order for the summer weeks shifts every year. Over three years each group picks first once.

Seniority or job title as a priority looks logical, but it fixes the same order forever: a new hire would wait years for an August. If summer genuinely matters more for some people - parents of school-age children, people whose families live far away - make that a separate rule with a name, not a quiet exception.

And let people swap weeks with each other as long as coverage does not suffer. Most clashes are settled by a swap without a manager ever getting involved.

After approval the schedule keeps living

An approved schedule is not carved in stone. Children get ill, projects slip, people leave and join. To keep the schedule from turning into a file nobody opens, three things help:

  • Changes go the same way as requests. To move your leave you ask; the manager sees what the change does to coverage and approves it or not;
  • A quarterly review. Compare the plan with the leave people actually took. A big gap by September is a signal to talk now, not in December;
  • New people go into the schedule straight away. Someone who joins in March should get their own weeks, not whatever is left after everyone else.
The law behind a leave schedule varies widely. In Ukraine an annual schedule is mandatory and must be approved by 5 January; in the Netherlands the employee’s wishes set the dates unless the employer objects in writing, with serious business reasons, within two weeks of the request. Check the law of every country where your people are employed before you publish the schedule.